|
|
Post by Ruby Lehane on Oct 9, 2009 23:40:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Mary Evans on Oct 10, 2009 0:28:03 GMT
One guess: Because it gets people talking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dixie Holden-Greene on Oct 10, 2009 0:37:24 GMT
I think there's a common misconception when it comes to the Nobel Peace Prize. I see it more as an incentive to get people to do well.
But regardless, he's done a few things to move peace forward in the world already - more than anyone I can think of off the top of my head.
And uh... >> Michael Jackson was also nominated for that prize...so... >> what's it say?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ruby Lehane on Oct 10, 2009 1:02:28 GMT
Yeah...well let's just say this year must have had a lack of nominees.
|
|
